requestId:684c3e51e2e6d9.41220847.
The two-wheeled rigging between China and the world system
———From the head: to develop independently as the Central Government
Author: Yao Zhongqiu (Teacher from the Department of Political Science, Institute of International Studies, China)
Source: “World Political Research” 2021 Second Edition 10th Edition
Content summary
The resources needed by the post-development countries to develop live in the living boundary system, but the system is arranged. Therefore, for the post-development countries, whether they can enter the system, how to advance, how deep they can go, what components to build, and whether they can add and remove the mat when needed, and move forward and move from the head when appropriate are the strategic decisions of the country’s top-level battle. Since 1949, China has had two rounds of dispersed mats with the world system – from the head: the first round is the Eastern System led by the American Republic at the beginning of its founding, and turned into the Eastern System led by Su’s alliance; the second round is the Eastern System led by Su’s friendship at the end of the 1950s, when the relationship between China and Su’s friendship broke down, Su’s alliance displaced China, and China gradually contacted the East. This article briefly sorts out the process of two trunking trunking – from the head to remind China of its independent development gains; based on this historical experience, a brief theoretical discussion on the needs, conditions and consequences of a country and the world system are removed from the head to the need, conditions and consequences; finally, it analyzes the political will of the new world system implicated in the country’s new development strategy and then cooperates with the political will of the new world system that is born to produce as the middle.
【Keywords】
From the head; the world system; national independence
1. Problems, literature and methods
In recent years, american has increasingly clearly and widely sought to remove the burden from China – that is, to dispel China, to eliminate China from the world system it leads. Faced with this approach and the COVID-19 epidemic, China began to adjust its national development strategy since mid-2020, and moved from a practical international cycle to a new development format that focuses on the domestic cycle and promotes each other’s international cycle. This implies the meaning of realizing partial detachment, reliance, and realizing independent development in the focus key technology field. In this way, the expedition of the strong in the world system and the dismantling strategy of the weak have become issues that the academic community must urgently study in depth.
History can be used as a sage. In the past mid-century, China has had two experiences of dismantling or being dismantled from the head: the first time was the Oriental World System led by the People’s Republic of China at the beginning of its founding with the American Republic of China, turning into the Oriental World System led by Su’s Joint; the second time began at the end of the 50s of the 20th century, and the friendship between China and Su ended. Su jointly dismantled China, and China and Su were gradually contacted with ameri in the early 1970s.The Oriental World System is directed by can.
These two repellents—the head-on repellents are the key points of the historical process of New China and the key points of the changes in the world strategy format after the Second World War. From a global perspective, China finally achieved good development achievements and maintained political and economic independence. This confession of the two-time strategic decisions of the head-on strategy are fundamentally correct. Deeply studying its process and getting rid of it will help us understand the nature of the modern world system and understand the political logic of China’s strategic decisions in this system for realizing independent development; the most important thing is that this logic is to follow the country’s new development format and the “14th Five-Year Plan”.
This article borrows Wallerstein’s theory of the world system, but for expansion: the Oriental Socialist Campaign led by Su Lian is also regarded as a world system. The reason for applying this concept is that the world system is economical at first and has a relationship between the middle and the edge (or the outer side). “Destroy” is a strategy for external countries to seek independent development. By taking initiative and temporarily dismantling the arrangement system, it constructs its own political independence and development independent right. The “exclusion” related to it refers to the hegemonic countries in the world system that unite central countries with the help of various mechanisms and policies to prohibit specific external countries from living activities within the boundary system and obtaining resources needed for development. Neither the removal nor the removal can eliminate all relationships, but they are separated from each other from the strategic level, no longer insist on a systemic division of labor, so they no longer engage in systematic sexual marriages. After being dismantled or being dismantled, later countries can then hang out with the world system from the head, that is, to enter the world system from the head, which is the “integration” discussed in the academic community over the past few decades.
This article focuses on removing the mat and hanging the mat from the head. The focus is on removing the mat. In this regard, the Chinese and foreign academic circles have already discussed it, and the basic development will be carried out along three lines.
The first line is the trade protection theory. As the father of the founding of the American nation, Han Millton, a federal party member, was a late writer. Faced with the UK’s leading technical advantages, Han Millton submitted a “Manufacturing Report” to the National Assembly in 1791, proposing that in order to develop the country’s “old-time business”, he must establish a strong country and adopt a strict trade protection policy. The “american school” recommended by the 19th官网彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩German Liszt, a German, had been in american for many years. He observed the implementation of american protection policy and believed that he had inherited Han Millton’s thoughts. In the “National System of Political Economy”, the key point was to remove the protection theory from the industrial development countries at a certain level through protection taxes, so as to seek independent development of the country’s “old-time industry”. Diet Sen, a German scholar who inherits Liszt’s theory of thinking traditionIn 1977, Haas published the World Economic Order and Development Policy: A Call for Defeat, advocating the post-development countries to follow the path of “defeat-type development”. The word “dissociation” used is equivalent to de-coupling, which means defeat. The Historical Experience of European Development, published in 1982, further applied for the issue of “dis-sociation as a development rationale”.
The second line is the theory that a country has built socialism. Marx discussed the global nature of capitalism, and thus constructed the first theory of world system in thinking in history, and believed that socialist reactions are also global. However, the reaction broke out in Russia for the first time, and the reborn Suvie country was slapped by the capitalist world system, and it was in fact defecation. Under this situation, the “one country’s reactionary theory” in the development of Si Dalin is “one country to build socialism”, which believes that Su Lian itself can build socialism, and the temporary defecation is normalized. In this way, Si Dalin believes that the most basic task of the Su Party and the country is to realize industrialization outside the living system and through internal accumulation. This is the rationale for his five-year plan. However, in fact, after the Oriental Economic Crisis broke out, Su immediately seized the opportunity and tried his best to attract Oriental capital and technology, which formed a head-on lock. As a result, Su Lian Agile Tree established a complete and independent industrial system. The Slarin version of the defecation theory has a grand impact on socialist stakes.
The third line of search developed in the discussion of Oriental Marxist ideology economic scholars on “underdevelopment” and relying on Latin America and Third World countries, and was proposed earlier by Samir Amin. In 1969, Amin proposed the concept of “de-linking”; in the book “World Scale of World Scale-Undevelopment Criticism” published in 1970, Amin once again clearly stated: “The break with the world market is an important condition for development.” In 1985, Amin said in “Destroyment: Towards the Middle of the World In the book “Handling Network”, it focuses on the defecation of the defecation that he advocates; two years later, Amin published an article “Remarks on the Concept of Defecation” to apply, which will attract discussions in the academic community. Franck, who has been paying attention to the lack of development in Latin America for a
發佈留言